Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 22:46:52 GMT -6
Pinterest shareholders are suing members of the company's board of directors and several top executives for allegedly ignoring or deliberately allowing discrimination against women and people of color. The lawsuit claims that the board of directors, including Pinterest co-founders Ben Silbermann and Evan Sharp, actively perpetrated or knowingly ignored high-profile discrimination and retaliation allegations against former Pinterest COO Francoise Brougher and two Black executives. , Ifeoma Ozoma and Aerica Shimizu Banks. A Pinterest spokesperson stated that: Pinterest's leadership and Board of Directors take their fiduciary duties seriously and are committed to continuing our efforts to help ensure that Pinterest is a place where all of our employees feel included and supported... We believe that the actions we have initiated, as well as the ongoing independent review regarding our culture, policies and practices, will help us achieve our goal of building a diverse, equitable and inclusive environment for all.
The lawsuit singles out Pinterest chairman, co-founder and CEO Silbermann, in particular, for creating a boys' club at the top that systematically ignored claims of pay disparity and the inability to advance for women and people of color. Furthermore, he alleges that even when employees told Silbermann about Pinterest's problems, he did nothing to BYB Directory change the situation. In the lawsuit there is a paragraph where you can read the following: She repeatedly put herself before the Company, surrounding herself with men who say yes to everything and marginalizing women who dared to challenge Pinterest's white male leadership cabal. In the summer of 2020, Ozoma and Banks first shared their stories of being underpaid, undervalued, and cheated on on Twitter.
The two came forward after Pinterest issued a statement in the wake of the George Floyd protests, saying: They wanted to expose the company's hypocrisy for saying black lives matter publicly, while mistreating its black employees privately. While Pinterest first denied Ozoma and Banks' allegations, the company has since done a U-turn and hired a law firm to evaluate its internal practices. I spoke out to let people know and I want accountability, but don't expect it in a white supremacist system. Ifeoma Ozoma Her story prompted other current and former Pinterest employees to speak out, including Brougher, who filed a gender discrimination lawsuit two months later. Her lawsuit states how she was given a different stock compensation vesting schedule than her peers, which dramatically affected her compensation.
The lawsuit singles out Pinterest chairman, co-founder and CEO Silbermann, in particular, for creating a boys' club at the top that systematically ignored claims of pay disparity and the inability to advance for women and people of color. Furthermore, he alleges that even when employees told Silbermann about Pinterest's problems, he did nothing to BYB Directory change the situation. In the lawsuit there is a paragraph where you can read the following: She repeatedly put herself before the Company, surrounding herself with men who say yes to everything and marginalizing women who dared to challenge Pinterest's white male leadership cabal. In the summer of 2020, Ozoma and Banks first shared their stories of being underpaid, undervalued, and cheated on on Twitter.
The two came forward after Pinterest issued a statement in the wake of the George Floyd protests, saying: They wanted to expose the company's hypocrisy for saying black lives matter publicly, while mistreating its black employees privately. While Pinterest first denied Ozoma and Banks' allegations, the company has since done a U-turn and hired a law firm to evaluate its internal practices. I spoke out to let people know and I want accountability, but don't expect it in a white supremacist system. Ifeoma Ozoma Her story prompted other current and former Pinterest employees to speak out, including Brougher, who filed a gender discrimination lawsuit two months later. Her lawsuit states how she was given a different stock compensation vesting schedule than her peers, which dramatically affected her compensation.