|
|
Post by Justin Sebik on Jan 7, 2011 9:18:00 GMT -6
For now  Now to win POVs. I think none of us should risk vetoing Jason's noms unless we are 100% sure what would happen if we did. Even then, I feel like our room is so kickass that a plan to backdoor one of us wouldn't be an impossibility. If I win veto, I'm leaving everything the same. |
|
|
|
Post by Eric Ouellette on Jan 7, 2011 9:26:45 GMT -6
Cool let's hope all noms stay the same lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Annie Whittington on Jan 7, 2011 10:26:00 GMT -6
We should help each other to win PoV. And we keep nominations the same. But I don't think we're in danger at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric Ouellette on Jan 7, 2011 10:42:34 GMT -6
Yeah I agree
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Hansen on Jan 7, 2011 15:33:51 GMT -6
Yes I agree we should.. I def don't plan on using the veto noms def need to stay the same
|
|
|
|
Post by Annie Whittington on Jan 8, 2011 11:48:22 GMT -6
Both of my statements are false.
|
|
|
|
Post by Annie Whittington on Jan 8, 2011 11:48:58 GMT -6
Actually we should organize ourselves. Who should win the vetoes? That way we don't look obvious by having the same scores.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric Ouellette on Jan 8, 2011 18:08:27 GMT -6
First statement is true. Second is false
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Hansen on Jan 8, 2011 23:29:53 GMT -6
both of mine are false.. i tried making it look like they could def be true
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Hansen on Jan 8, 2011 23:35:19 GMT -6
just remember we need to guess wrong though because we get points for how many wrong guesses on our statements
|
|
